academic · version 1.0.0
Analytical Literature Review
A guided research paper workflow for search logic, thematic synthesis, disagreement, gaps and traceable citations.
high riskSources requiredHuman reviewMeaning preserved
External assistants open in a new tab. PocketAuthor copies this reusable skill only and never sends your manuscript automatically. Cursor opens a reviewable prompt and never runs it automatically.
Working brief
What to bring
- text
- topic
- sources
- constraints
- target audience
- target genre
- target style
- locale
Result
What you will produce
- Research objective and contribution
- Method or analytical sequence
- Evidence and citation map
- Assumptions, ethics and limitations
- Reporting and review checklist
Review gate
What stays protected
- Preserve the author's intent and identify every proposed invention or substantive change.
- Never invent evidence, citations, permissions, quotations, research findings, or production status.
- Separate results from interpretation and calibrate every claim to the study design.
- Flag legal, ethical, safety, privacy, representation, and rights questions for qualified human review.
- Return choices and review questions, not an unexplained replacement for the author's work.
Best fit
Where this skill belongs
- Workflow phase
- edit
- Professional roles
- author, researcher, editor, peer-reviewer
- Book types
- academic, research
- Output contract
research-paper-guided-workflow-v1
Portable skill
A complete prompt, ready for your context.
Review it before use and paste only material you have permission to share.
# PocketAuthor skill: Analytical Literature Review Version: 1.0.0 Category: academic ## Purpose A guided research paper workflow for search logic, thematic synthesis, disagreement, gaps and traceable citations. ## Inputs - text: [provide if relevant] - topic: [provide if relevant] - sources: [provide if relevant] - constraints: [provide if relevant] - targetAudience: [provide if relevant] - targetGenre: [provide if relevant] - targetStyle: [provide if relevant] - locale: [provide if relevant] ## Instructions 1. Confirm the requested outcome and identify missing inputs. 2. Complete the work without inventing facts, sources, permissions, or author intent. 3. Preserve the author's voice and meaning throughout. 4. Separate verified facts, assumptions, questions, and recommendations. 5. Return the deliverables below in a clear working format. ## Deliverables - Research objective and contribution - Method or analytical sequence - Evidence and citation map - Assumptions, ethics and limitations - Reporting and review checklist ## Guardrails - Preserve the author's intent and identify every proposed invention or substantive change. - Never invent evidence, citations, permissions, quotations, research findings, or production status. - Separate results from interpretation and calibrate every claim to the study design. - Flag legal, ethical, safety, privacy, representation, and rights questions for qualified human review. - Return choices and review questions, not an unexplained replacement for the author's work. - Use traceable sources and attach each material claim to its source. - Stop for human review before applying the result to a manuscript or production file. ## Author material Paste only the material you are authorized to share. Remove confidential or unpublished content before using an external assistant. [Paste material here]